Salman Khan and Chinkara shooting case

Salman Khan's role in chinkara shooting case gives a lesson that be it a celebrity or the common man, people should know their line of limits and not be cruel to animals, as they are dumb and cannot express their pain or suffering .
Do you agree with this statement?

Sumit said...
Usually we should not be cruel towards animals, but self defence against Stray Dogs and Lizards is Justified i guess (kidding)...however, I would love to see an example that can teach the terrorists to be kind towards humans.

Frenchita said...
I more than agree... not just a lesson .b ut punishment should be meted out ..and executed .. so why is he given bail totally biased .is it .because he is a celebrity that he got away .. ? wat a shame !

Abx said...
cruelty not only against animals but aginst anybody(even nature) should be punished. Equality before law is also justified.

LP53 said...
ITS LAW, STUPID (Hunting protected species is breaking law. Anyone, Salman included, that breaks ANY law should be prosecuted quickly and punished. Not drag the cases for years. Cruelty to animals is not the issue.)

RIIAZ said...
What about the thousands of other people doin the same thing ........DO u think poaching came to a Full stop after the salmam case......It still probably is going on ..WITH SUM PEOPLES CONSENT ....SALMAN WAS TARGETEDD CUZ HE WAS A CELEBRITY ....AND THE MEDIA DOESNT HAVE ANY OTHER WORK THN TO LOOK FOR ANY BLOODY NEWS THAT THEY CAN GET THR HANDS ON AND MAKE IT PUBLIC AND the former has to pay 4 it cuz its in all pplss view now so the govt then decides to take action ............CUZ THE MATTERS BECUM PUBLIC........???????

Wise donkee said...
people wont change

Tejbir said...
what about the ladies who are cruel towards animals like me? heard that song?.... "ankhiyon se goli maarey" now which court punishes them? LOLZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

GussaWaala said...
It does not matter who shoots. You break the law you go to jail. Period.

Chakoli said...
Crulity has reached its peak so I guess it dosent matter even if celebrity is punished for killing a dumb animal.....

Ellen said...
Celebrities always take the limelight right or wrong, don't they? :-) Same thing here for the shallowest reason. But if it be serious, they always manage to get away with it still, law or no law.

Gul said...
ek chinkara hi case nahi salmaan ka aur bhi kai case hai.Lekin es nirihprani ki nirmam hatyaa?kya bigadaa tha chinkara ne salmaan ka?but apne mad me mast salmaan ko kya kalpanaa uski tadapbhari dardnaak mout ka.Sajaa to salmaan ko honi hi chahiye.sach kahe to ye chinkara ki hi bad-duvaye hi hai jo salmaan bhugat rahe hai.Us chinkara me bhi tum jaisi ek jaan the salmaan Babu?so uske dard ki aah ka asar to bhugatna hi padega?

Ban on Women Bartenders

Delhi Government feels that there should be a ban on women bartenders in the city. Reason-Men often make advances towards women under influence of liquor leading to offensive behaviour which is an affront to the dignity of women .
Do you think that Ban is justified?

Savy said...
if men get drunk n misbehave..they do so with all the females around them..a lil more so with female bartenders...but a ban? this sounds so immature.

Abx said...
Ban for what? they know that they r in the profession where everyone is in hangover. better they shouldn't accept that job.

nz said...
totally agree with above comments.

Lavina said...
who is it?? All set to protect the women????

Frenchita said...
Yes ... in Delhi , women in any profession are liable to be harassed eh he :-) even 80 year olds !!

Sumit said...
A ban would be a stupidity. If women who face this so called offensive behavoir, why is the govt. having problem.... and if they categorise men as those who misbehave, they should infact ban women going to bars in any form... :p

Cheetah said...
we can ban all these things later when we feel we are safe from terrorists and enemies who plant bombs everywhere. Let the government first look into what is happening with these bloody acts and later various bans.

Chakoli said...
What nonsense.... Men will be men...and they dont need liquor to act up...they can act at any moment... Even offices and DTC buses faces so many sexual harrasements....so they shud also be ban.... our govt has gone nuts... instead of making laws strict and protecting them...they are trtying to get on safer side... ridiculous...

Wise donkee said...
Drunken driving is far more serious, let the govt concentrate on that. Instead of banning, perhaps the bars must ensure, the women can get away with slapping the man back, if any advance is made..instead of please the customer attitude..How may women behind the bar are in a postition to refuse advances? Many would have a different view point if it was their mother sister or wife behind the bar..

Tejbir said...
arey mere bhai first you tell me which bar in Delhi has women bartenders? before they impose the ban lemme visit it yaar LOL

Surabhi said...
no point in a ban...when a woman opts for this profession she knows what shes getting into..and anyway...women will be misbehaved with..profession no profession!

Vrij said...
I guess a woman would feel safer with a bottle in hand.. she can whirl it in self defence!

LP53 said...
Five Year Compulsory Military Service must be inroduced for all BARTENDERS.

Women and HR Profession

Women are more Successful than Men as a HR Professional beacause listening, understanding, empathising and helping comes more naturally to women.
Do you agree with this fact?

LP53 said...
Hmmm.. As a married man, don't agree with "listening ...comes naturally to women". Are biwis not women, if that is true? Power talks. Often HR wallows in 'control' mindset. Power has no gender bias. It corrupts equally, men and women alike. Ask any woman on top; she knows

Abx said...
it depends on individual..........weather man or women.

Sumit said...
Though success is a relative term, women certainly have some advantage on these skills.

nz said...
Why just HR ? I think women are successful in every profession because of all the qualities you mentioned and because they are smart and intelligent !!

Rekha said...
I think women react emotionally faster than men and this turns out to be advantageous to them as HR PROFESSIONALS ....but as far as listening, understanding, empathising n helping goes.....it depends upon person to person....... to be a successful HR PROFESSIONAL .....all u need is a good mix of FEMININE AND MASCULINE TRAITS ......so anybody who possess it (be it a man or woman) would be successful ......

Wise donkee said...
men have equal chances of success, as women, in every field:

Frenchita said...
Yes . I agree .. and this quality of theirs should be better tapped and put to use

Imran said...
IT DEPENDS...!!!

Vrij said...
Totally agree.. nahin toh biwi maaregi.. after all she too is a HR professional!

Sk said...
yaa i agree.....because womens have the equal right to do what c wants n c is is capable too to handle anykind of situations like man

Ellen said...
I think both genders would do equally well at the job. :-) No argument there. I've seen my friends, male and female, excelling at their HR posts. It's not who's better at it, but rather who can be more effective with using the talents GOD provided each one of the two genders separately and distinctly. Women are equipped by an all-wise and knowing God with the distinct ability to NURTURE growth - development - maturity in a person. Nurturing or the mother instinct as commonly known therefore is a woman's basic function. That, as I understand it, can work wonders in a people-oriented job as HR. While the men, as is generally known, are more adept with facts and figures thus are far more capable of executing firm policies, rules, and company regulations decisively. I think the two can work together complementing each other 's roles. One can fill-in the other person's weakness with his or her own strength and vice-versa. That can be a power-packed duo to beat!

Redivider said...
As a perennial cynic myself, will you permit me to ask 'do all women qualify?' would there be no 'degree of difference' if they happen to be Single, married and divorced? I dont think we can generalize this, can we?

FIR for scolding student in class

Expanding the definition of corporal punishment to cover any form of adverse treatment—from scolding to death—the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) has urged parents to be fearless in filing FIRs against schools if children complain of such abuse.
Do you think that scolding a student for his/her mistakes is a crime?

Ellen said...
Children come to school to learn. If they make mistakes in the classroom and surely they would, the teacher should focus on the learning opportunity of that moment. Because the greatest lessons can be had and learned through one's honest mistakes, whether inside or outside of the classroom.

LP53 said...
Spare the rod, spoil the teacher? Use it on his/her behind! Teachers need punishment. They don't learn nothing! Esp, to deal with cute little goon.da(i)s.

nz said...
Even though I am totally against hurting/abusing a child or student but there should be some sort of consequences for misbehaviour otherwise kids will get out of hands and India will face the same situation as most of the western world where parents or teachers cant do much and the teenagers are getting into crime and ending up in prisons. may be encouraging positrive behaviour, talking to parents or counselling should be considered as some of the options but children should know that there should be some consequence if they dont follow the rules.

Frenchita said...
dont know about death ..in schools ...thats too much punishment ..he he ...but scoldings are ok . teachers should implement when necessary and effective . for some students ...its water off a duck's back ..no use :( .then dont spare the rod ..parents should be cooperative wiht teachers too and teacher should not over do it either ...

Sumit said...
Schools are temples of learning, and apart from bookish lessons their are moral lessons to be learnt, which include that if you make mistakes without learning from them, you are bound to be punished .. so if we take the scolding or punishing part out the equation, children might be inclined towards making same mistakes again and again and not learn from them. There have been rare cases of teachers who have gone to extremes in punishing the students (which are bad) but the whole thing has been blown out of proportion (again by media), and people are now using it to tarnish the image of Teachers in general.

Tejbir said...
how i remember those slaps from the class teacher and principal whatever it felt then those slaps and the moments are fond memories now!

Chakoli said...
Everything in a limit is fine but when it exceeds law shud be thr to stop that.There have been many cases where student are beaten up to death...thats wrong...!!! Why just teacers even parents do beat their child so harshly......

Guy_on_black_YBX said...
I dun think this can be compared to our school times, neither teachers not students are like past. we need to do a SWOT :P

Sanjay Dutt and Mumbai blasts

Sanjay Dutt was sentenced to a jail term of 6 years in Mumbai blasts case.
Do you think that this judgement will affect his filmy career?

Frenchita said...
Not at all . on the other hand he is more popular now than ever also it is to be seen if he really serves the jail sentence .. will probably have a private gym ,swimming pool and 'ghar ka khana ' while in jail

LP53 said...
His last two stints in Arthur Jail honed his bhaigiri and gandhigiri skills. This should be third and final to catapult him to Super-stardom, in league with ABsr.

Abx said...
mamu bole to...........waat lag gaya

Savy said...
i shouldnt think so..he got out before and was really endearing and has gotton into it again amidst all being shocked..but I think th guy has only grown wiser and being nice hearted as he is has long lasting friends..who will not ignore him.

Ruggedboyz said...
sanju baba for me is the ultimate rockstar he difies age and shall rock for me even when he is +6 on 48 also it will be nice if he was allowed to shoot for munna bhai chala america but hey 6 years i just feel is a lil long coz he just possesed the arms and did not use it to harm any one thing being wonder why the arms act is so strange mebbe coz its ak

Vrij said...
Happy Friendship Day to Sanjay Dutt.. poor chap.. he got less than he deserved. For all those who think his punishment was harsh, just ask those who were directly affected by the blasts. They wud have asked for death for each of those involved and Sanjay is one of them.

Chakoli said...
dunnot worry....MUNNA BHAI will be back ...:-))

Indrasish said...
I don't think so. Maybe it will take him sometime to revive his career but he will be able to do it for sure.

Nikhil said...
waat lag gayi muna ki toh

Wise donkey said...
care more about the floods in bihar than a criminal's career. but if i were to guess, it wouldnt be affected..

Tejbir said...
jab se main thora sa badnaam ho gaya yaaron mera bada naam ho gaya is a song picturised on sanju baba see, he lives upto his words! LOL

The Bard said...
No never...he can always make a comeback...he has his own munnabhai merchandise which will help him in that cause...and 5years is a very less time.we know abt actors who had string of flops for 5years yet are surviving...like abhi bachan wen he started his career...so sanju can always come back